A Lie travels round the world while the truth gets its shoes on.
Sunday, June 29th, 2008Proverbs 3:16 - 18 Blessings of Wisdom
Length of days is in her right hand,
In her left hand riches and honor.
Her ways are ways of pleasantness,
And all her paths are peace.
She is a tree of life to those who take hold of her,
And happy are all who retain her.
Yes Gail, It’s still from Easter. I’ll eventually get past Easter. I’ve started taking photos in slugs, and not many in between camera occasions.
The boys love their Uncle Justin. I think I understand! He does play and show them a good time.

There’s the seed of an essay taking shape in my head, which I need to write. I have to submit something to my writers’ group and this is what is developing. Slowly. Very slowly.
I’ve blogged before about the Mohamed Al Durah affair, and it was a snoozer to say the least. But there’s been some additional publication on the evolution and so I wanted to rewrite, and try to bring it up to date. Unfortunately, I can’t find where I blogged on it. Tags are supposed to help with this. So I was thinking that an essay would have this outline,
First there is the chronology of events. October 30, an iconic image was taken, film released by France 2, and Charles Enderline, the journalist, and transmitted around the world, blaming Israel for the boy’s, Mohamed al Durah’s, death. The following excerpts are from that long chronology.
Mohammed becomes the motivating theme in the second intifada with photos and poems in his memory.
The iconic image

October 23, 2000
Physicist Nahum Shahaf and engineer Yosef Doriel lead a re-enactment of the scene under the auspices of Yom Tov Samia. The analysis raises serious doubts about Israel’s culpability. Doriel’s report can be seen here.
December 2000
David Kupelian, managing editor of World Net Daily, publishes his exposé, ‘Who Killed Mohammed al-Dura?’ in which he posits that the boy was killed by his own people for purposes of propaganda.
Now the seeds of doubt are sewn. There is no doubt there is injustice in Palestine. But the Palestinians do themselves no favors when the levels of depravity seem to find no depths, and truth is a necessary casualty to the cause.
July 15, 2002
Amnon Lord, Israeli journalist and author publishes ‘Who killed Mohamed al-Dura? Blood Libel—Model 2000’ , arguing that indeed the event was staged.
Now there is a “counter narrative” to the murder by the Isreali Defense Forces.
The law suit:
(2004) Karsenty publishes on his web site, a media watchdog in France, calling for Enderline to resign from France2 for publishing the film, and never coming clean or apologizing for the distortions.
France2 sues Karsenty for defamation.
Karsenty loses in court.
September 15, 2005
Richard Landes, history professor at Boston University, launches his DVD , Pallywood, on the Second Draft website. He argues that al-Durah is merely the most famous instance of a larger practice of staging news events among Palestinians.
May 21, 2008, the appeal was decided. Contrary to the first trial, the film that was not used was examined. Karsenty was vindicated on appeal.
In the last few days, there have been other rumblings. In an article dated July 7, 2008 (ok, that’s a bit more than a week away) a French journalist ran down a good many of her friends over the years who have signed a petition in support of Enderline.
To understand the al-Dura affair, it helps to keep one thing in mind: In France, you can’t own up to a mistake. This is a country where the law of the Circus Maximus still applies: Vae victis, Woe to the vanquished. Slip, and it’s thumbs-down. Not for nothing was Brennus a Gaul. His modern French heirs don’t do apologies well, or at all if they can possibly help it. Why should they? That would be an admission of weakness. Blink, and you become the fall guy.
Meanwhile a blogging psychologist, Shrink Wrapped, that I look at now and again wonders why Isreal is so silent. Why are they making no noise in their own defense in all this. It’s a very interesting study of some of the psycho-dynamics of this whole affair.
How else do you explain so much self-hatred, and lack of tolerance even for Israel’s mistakes in war?Guilt is a central motivator for Jews and Christians, in marked contrast to Honor-Shame cultures where all behavior is acceptable as long as it is not exposed to a critical observer. Those of us raised in a Judeo-Christian culture would never condone the kinds of “news” creation and manipulation that is normal procedure for Palestinians or the Iraqi insurgents. (Those who cannot imagine that our enemies would manufacture and manipulate the news in such a manner are guilty of the narcissistic crime of imagining that others’ minds are organized the same way theirs is.) It is guilt that supports a too diffident reaction to accusations of child murder (Al-Dura) or war crimes (Haditha). Guilt is the feeling one has when one falls short of one’s ideals. When a child dies or innocents lose their lives during the course of a battle, our immediate impulse is to examine our own behavior and look for the flaws within us that have led to the tragedy. Our enemies do not have such limitations; in fact, the Palestinians and our enemies in Iraq revel in the atrocities they commit.
But, this is an insufficient explanation for a complicated set of behaviors and all human behavior is multiply determined.
For the Jew, normal guilt is often exacerbated by the survivor’s guilt felt by those only two or three generations removed from the Holocaust.
As well, many Jews have unconsciously adopted the anti-Israel, anti-Zionist, anti-Semitic attitudes that are prevalent on the left. These attitudes among Jews arise from a mix of defensive “identification with the aggressor” and conscious and unconscious self-hatred.
The truth is getting it’s shoes on. The lies have traveled around the world many times.
I guess I’ve got the bones of an essay. Now I only need to write it. Thanks for reading this far!









